Search 2-pop.com Search the Web
 
Codec Smackdown
February 8, 2010



Modern digital acquisition, post and distribution wouldn’t be possible without data rate reduction, AKA compression. People like to disparage compression, but I dare say that few folks – including most post production professionals – have actually seen much uncompressed content. In fact, by the time you see a television program or a digitally-projected movie it has passed through at least three, four or more different compression algorithms – i.e. codecs.

 

Click digitalfilms.wordpress.com for the whole story.


SPONSORED LINKS
 
 
 




COMMENTS (1)
02/10/2010
Unfortunately this is not a good comparison because the tool use to compress matters almost as much as the target codec. Using FCP or quicktime to compress or import yields mediocre results. This should be done again using compressor or other high quality tool. I'm also surprised DnxHD175(x) was not tested since it seems to be the best all around codec in terms of tradeoff between datarate and quality.

More...     
Leave a Comment:
 
Text Only 2000 characters limit
Enter the word as it is shown in the box below: (Why?)
(case sensitive)
 
 
BLOG
Final Draft for iPad is Looking to Field Test 
Just Added to Digital Video Expo Conference Schedule! 
8 Things I’ve Learned From Shooting Long Form Drama on the 5D That I didn’t Know Before I Started 
Look ma, no keys! or The Future of Picture Editing 
HDSLR Car Rigging and Lighting Workshop 
Bradley Buecker: Editing Eat Pray Love 
IFP's Filmmaker Conference to Include Nevins, Sloss, and Rosenthal 
OTHER NEWS STORIES
FORUMS